NIWA_Tangaroa
Benefits of shipping:
Resilience for natural disasters or emergencies.
NIWA_Kaharoa
Ships carry hazardous / dangerous cargo more safely than road, rail and air.
Moana_Chief_with_tugs
15% of New Zealand's inter-regional freight is carried by sea
Moana_Chief_with_cargo
Ships can handle oversized, heavy and bulky cargo that road, rail and air can't.
Matuku_2016
Freight volumes are forecast to increase 50% by 2040.
It won't all fit onto our roads!
Kokako_2017_leaving_Korean_shipyard
New Zealand’s total freight task: 278.7 million tonnes.
Coastal shipping carries approx 10 million tonnes (3.5%).
Interislander_Aratere_and_Kaitaki
1.15m people are transported across the Cook Strait every year
Interislander_Arahura_in_Sounds
The volume of domestic freight moved by shipping has increased 50% over the last 10 years.
Holcim_Buffalo_2019-11-04
Approx $28 billion road and rail freight is shipped between the North and South Islands each year
Holcim_Buffalo_2020
1 standard container Auckland to Christchurch:
road: $2200-$3000
rail: $1300 - $1900
ship: $850 - $1300
Chatham_2
418,470 containers are moved around the NZ coast per annum
Chatham_1
Shipping: one-eighth the emissions of road per tonne of freight moved
Bluebridge_Straitsman_2019_3
Benefits of shipping:
Lower emissions per tonne of freight moved.
BlueBridge_Straitsman_2019_1
Increasing total freight carried by ship by just 2% would reduce total transport emissions by 16%.
Anatoki_2016_at_Whanganui_Bar
Benefits of shipping:
Greater control over our domestic supply chains.
Anatoki_2016_03_15_Loading_Fuel_for_Chatham_Island
Shipping: 60% the emissions of rail per tonne of freight moved
previous arrowprevious arrow
next arrownext arrow

Submission on whether international shipping emissions should be included in 2050 targets (2024)

New Zealand Shipping Federation submission to the Climate Change Commission on whether emissions from international shipping and aviation should be included in the 2050 target, and if so how. NZSF’s submission only looked at international shipping, not aviation, and questioned:

  • Whether a New Zealand-specific target would reduce emissions from international shipping more than would be achieved in the absence of a New Zealand-specific target
  • The Commission’s assumption any IMO target would not be met, but any New Zealand-specific target would be met
  • The risk a New Zealand-specific target would put international shipping services at risk
  • The selective use of market access analysis
  • The assessment of availability of alternative maritime fuels
  • The Commission’s preference for a New Zealand-specific target instead being part of a global system led by the International Maritime Organisation.

Read the document: